Synthesization+of+The+Fight+with+Parliament

Well, the results are in. Most people had the same, or at least very similar responses to the question "Do you think there is any defence for or reasoning in favor of an absolute ruler(or Divine Right of Kings, or King Charles)? Whatever your answer is, please explain it-and try to look at it objectively." With no exceptions, everybody says that they would certainly prefer to live in a democracy than a monarchy, especially with a king like Charles. However, that part wasn't answering the question. While nobody defended King Charles' actions, many people mentioned how that in an idealistic world an absolute monarchy or dictatorship would be a great form of government, because there would be little or no red tape, and things could be done well and efficiently. To sum it up the many paragraphs of what was said, this is in stark contrast to modern democracy, which is weighed down by bureaucracy, corruption, and tangeld decision-making procedures. However, this is where the word "idealistic" comes in. If a King is intelligent, merciful, worldly, and in general enlightened, he(or she) would be a great ruler, and this would be a good idea way to run the country. However, while there are the rare Kings or Queens that can be described like that, history has shown us that there will almost certainly not be a succession of these rulers.

code  code

Written by Liam, Jason, and David.